Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Models and Dataset by M RN (9866504)

“…</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><p dir="ltr"><b>RAO (Rao Optimization Algorithm):</b><br>RAO is a parameter-less optimization algorithm that updates solutions based on simple arithmetic operations involving the best and worst individuals in the population. …”

Processed dataset to train and test the WGAN-GP_IMOA_DA_Ensemble model by Ramya Chinnasamy (21633527)

“…This framework integrates a novel biologically inspired optimization algorithm, the Indian Millipede Optimization Algorithm (IMOA), for effective feature selection. …”

DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx by Massaine Bandeira e Sousa (7866242)

“…Overall, the models exhibited a robust fit for all cooking times, showcasing the significant potential of NIRs as a high-throughput phenotyping tool for classifying cassava genotypes based on cooking time.…”

Table_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx by Massaine Bandeira e Sousa (7866242)

“…Overall, the models exhibited a robust fit for all cooking times, showcasing the significant potential of NIRs as a high-throughput phenotyping tool for classifying cassava genotypes based on cooking time.…”

Supplementary Material 8 by Nishitha R Kumar (19750617)

“…</li><li><b>XGboost: </b>An optimized gradient boosting algorithm that efficiently handles large genomic datasets, commonly used for high-accuracy predictions in <i>E. coli</i> classification.…”

Machine Learning-Ready Dataset for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Soham Savarkar (21811825)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">These biological metrics were used to define a binary toxicity label: entries were classified as toxic (1) or non-toxic (0) based on thresholds from standardized guidelines (e.g., ISO 10993-5:2009) and literature consensus. …”