Showing 1 - 20 results of 24 for search '(( binary based robust estimation algorithm ) OR ( binary image scale optimization algorithm ))*', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Determination of the Solute Content and Volumetric Properties of Binary Ionic Liquid Mixtures Using a Global Regularity of Molar Volume Expansion by Javad Hekayati (1383249)

    Published 2021
    “…For instance, the water content, which is of great significance in IL studies, can easily be estimated using the proposed algorithm. By doing so, an overall AARD of 3.47% was obtained for the estimation of the water content of 68 binary systems. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data by Fei Xue (24567)

    Published 2021
    “…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”
  7. 7

    Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment by Jianfang Cao (1881379)

    Published 2019
    “…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …”
  8. 8

    QSAR model for predicting neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza A viruses (H1N1) based on adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm by Z.Y. Algamal (5547620)

    Published 2020
    “…Obtaining a reliable QSAR model with few descriptors is an essential procedure in chemometrics. The binary grasshopper optimization algorithm (BGOA) is a new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, which has been used successfully to perform feature selection. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  12. 12

    Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  13. 13

    Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR. by Linus Woitke (22783534)

    Published 2025
    “…The image is then cleaned in c) using morphological filtering with an <i>opening</i> operation to remove small-scale noise. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  19. 19

    Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  20. 20

    Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”