Showing 101 - 120 results of 136 for search '(( binary based testing optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary data based optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102

    DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx by Yuhong Huang (115702)

    Published 2021
    “…We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105

    Parameter settings. by Yang Cao (53545)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Differential Evolution (DE) is widely recognized as a highly effective evolutionary algorithm for global optimization. It has proven its efficacy in tackling diverse problems across various fields and real-world applications. …”
  6. 106
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109

    GSE96058 information. by Sepideh Zununi Vahed (9861298)

    Published 2024
    “…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
  10. 110

    The performance of classifiers. by Sepideh Zununi Vahed (9861298)

    Published 2024
    “…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113

    Table_1_An efficient decision support system for leukemia identification utilizing nature-inspired deep feature optimization.pdf by Muhammad Awais (263096)

    Published 2024
    “…Next, a hybrid feature extraction approach is presented leveraging transfer learning from selected deep neural network models, InceptionV3 and DenseNet201, to extract comprehensive feature sets. To optimize feature selection, a customized binary Grey Wolf Algorithm is utilized, achieving an impressive 80% reduction in feature size while preserving key discriminative information. …”
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. 117

    Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Strategic Buyers by Pangpang Liu (18886419)

    Published 2024
    “…This underscores the rate optimality of our policy. Importantly, our policy is not a mere amalgamation of existing dynamic pricing policies and strategic behavior handling algorithms. …”
  18. 118

    Supplementary file 1_Comparative evaluation of fast-learning classification algorithms for urban forest tree species identification using EO-1 hyperion hyperspectral imagery.docx by Veera Narayana Balabathina (22518524)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Methods<p>Thirteen supervised classification algorithms were comparatively evaluated, encompassing traditional spectral/statistical classifiers—Maximum Likelihood, Mahalanobis Distance, Minimum Distance, Parallelepiped, Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Spectral Information Divergence (SID), and Binary Encoding—and machine learning algorithms including Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). …”
  19. 119

    Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat. by Enrico Bertozzi (22461709)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p dir="ltr">Additionally, an exhaustive hyperparameter search was performed using GridSearchCV to optimize the C, gamma, and kernel parameters (testing 'linear,' 'rbf,' 'poly,' and 'sigmoid'), aiming to find the highest-performing configuration. …”
  20. 120

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”