Search alternatives:
selection algorithm » detection algorithm (Expand Search), detection algorithms (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
sample selection » sample collection (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary case » binary mask (Expand Search), primary case (Expand Search)
case sample » case samples (Expand Search), based sample (Expand Search), case example (Expand Search)
selection algorithm » detection algorithm (Expand Search), detection algorithms (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
sample selection » sample collection (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary case » binary mask (Expand Search), primary case (Expand Search)
case sample » case samples (Expand Search), based sample (Expand Search), case example (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
An Extension of the Unified Skew-Normal Family of Distributions and its Application to Bayesian Binary Regression
Published 2024“…We discuss in detail the popular logit case, and we show that, when a logistic regression model is combined with a Gaussian prior, posterior summaries such as cumulants and normalizing constants can easily be obtained through the use of an importance sampling approach, opening the way to straightforward variable selection procedures. …”
-
5
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
6
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
7
-
8
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
9
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
10
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
11
Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element
Published 2022“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”
-
12
Causal Inference Under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions
Published 2023“…<p>We study causal inference under case-control and case-population sampling. Specifically, we focus on the binary-outcome and binary-treatment case, where the parameters of interest are causal relative and attributable risks defined via the potential outcome framework. …”
-
13
Table 1_Provider fidelity in tuberculosis screening practices among adolescents and adults living with HIV in public health facilities in Tanzania: a cross-sectional evaluation.doc...
Published 2025“…Simple random and systematic sampling methods were employed to select the records and sessions, respectively. …”
-
14
Table 2_Provider fidelity in tuberculosis screening practices among adolescents and adults living with HIV in public health facilities in Tanzania: a cross-sectional evaluation.doc...
Published 2025“…Simple random and systematic sampling methods were employed to select the records and sessions, respectively. …”
-
15
Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf
Published 2020“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”
-
16
Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides
Published 2024“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”
-
17
Data_Sheet_1_Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield...
Published 2022“…Hence, the study’s primary disadvantage is its small sample size. In this case, the dataset we utilized did not fully reflect the whole population. …”
-
18
DataSheet_2_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.pdf
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
19
DataSheet_1_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.xlsx
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
20
Image_1_Validation of miRNA signatures for ovarian cancer earlier detection in the pre-diagnosis setting using machine learning approaches.pdf
Published 2024“…</p>Methods<p>We included a total of 80 ovarian cancer cases contributing 80 serum samples and compared 40 serum samples from cases with samples collected <2 years prior to diagnosis with 40 serum samples from cases with sample collection ≥2 to 7 years. …”