Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
art optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), after optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
class art » class a (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
art optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), after optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
class art » class a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models.
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162).
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%).
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162).
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
-
16
Calibration curve of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
18
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
19
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
20
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”