Search alternatives:
data optimization » path optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search), art optimization (Expand Search)
b optimization » _ optimization (Expand Search), bboa optimization (Expand Search), fox optimization (Expand Search)
class data » claims data (Expand Search)
class b » class c (Expand Search), class _ (Expand Search), class i (Expand Search)
data optimization » path optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search), art optimization (Expand Search)
b optimization » _ optimization (Expand Search), bboa optimization (Expand Search), fox optimization (Expand Search)
class data » claims data (Expand Search)
class b » class c (Expand Search), class _ (Expand Search), class i (Expand Search)
-
1
<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow.
Published 2023“…<b>(B)</b> Focusing on the positive class only, the algorithm exploits FIM (<i>apriori</i> algorithm) to build a list of candidate interactions of any desired order, retaining those that have an empirical frequency above a given threshold <i>δ</i>. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Effects of Class Imbalance and Data Scarcity on the Performance of Binary Classification Machine Learning Models Developed Based on ToxCast/Tox21 Assay Data
Published 2022“…However, ToxCast assays differ in the amount of data and degree of class imbalance (CI). Therefore, the resampling algorithm employed should vary depending on the data distribution to achieve optimal classification performance. …”
-
9
-
10
Supplementary Material for: Penalized Logistic Regression Analysis for Genetic Association Studies of Binary Phenotypes
Published 2022“…Our estimate of m is the maximizer of a marginal likelihood obtained by integrating the latent log-ORs out of the joint distribution of the parameters and observed data. We consider two approximate approaches to maximizing the marginal likelihood: (i) a Monte Carlo EM algorithm (MCEM) and (ii) a Laplace approximation (LA) to each integral, followed by derivative-free optimization of the approximation. …”
-
11
-
12
The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162).
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162).
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
-
17
The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20
Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%).
Published 2025Subjects: