Illustration of the transformed binary images of normal, benign, and malignant samples into grayscale. حسب Tehnan I. A. Mohamed (16846175)

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The accuracy score change matrix following model development. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

Flow diagram of the proposed model. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162). حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The most effective active substances for subfertility treatment. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

Confusion matrix of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162). حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

Flow diagram of the conversion of drugs into active substances. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

Calibration curve of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. حسب Uğur Ejder (22683228)

الموضوعات:

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. حسب Michela C. Massi (14599915)

"…<b>(B)</b> Focusing on the positive class only, the algorithm exploits FIM (<i>apriori</i> algorithm) to build a list of candidate interactions of any desired order, retaining those that have an empirical frequency above a given threshold <i>δ</i>. …"

Sample image for illustration. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …"

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …"

Comparison analysis of computation time. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …"

Process flow diagram of CBFD. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …"

Precision recall curve. حسب Indhumathi S. (19173013)

"…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …"