Search alternatives:
process classification » protein classification (Expand Search), proposed classification (Expand Search), forest classification (Expand Search)
cost optimization » dose optimization (Expand Search), robust optimization (Expand Search), codon optimization (Expand Search)
binary complex » ternary complex (Expand Search), snare complex (Expand Search)
binary b » binary _ (Expand Search)
b cost » _ cost (Expand Search), a cost (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 64 for search '(( binary complex process classification algorithm ) OR ( binary b cost optimization algorithm ))*', query time: 0.61s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Feature selection convergence time comparison of various binary metaheuristic algorithms.

    Feature selection convergence time comparison of various binary metaheuristic algorithms. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    The quantum embedding circuit designed for the miRNA dataset, featuring three layers of repeated Hadamard (H), RZ, and control-NOT unitary gates.

    The quantum embedding circuit designed for the miRNA dataset, featuring three layers of repeated Hadamard (H), RZ, and control-NOT unitary gates. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Training loss results plotted against the number of iterations for (a) 9, (b) 10, (c) 11, and (d) 12 principal components.

    Training loss results plotted against the number of iterations for (a) 9, (b) 10, (c) 11, and (d) 12 principal components. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+SVC and NQE+QSVC in the 5 PCs case.

    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+SVC and NQE+QSVC in the 5 PCs case. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC12.

    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC12. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    The results of the ten performance metrics for NQE+SVC vs NQE+QSVC using (a) 9, (b) 10, (c) 11, and (d) 12 principle components, respectively.

    The results of the ten performance metrics for NQE+SVC vs NQE+QSVC using (a) 9, (b) 10, (c) 11, and (d) 12 principle components, respectively. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    The workflow diagram for the gene expression biomarker study which involve using principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the number of features (principal components), thus requiring fewer qubits.

    The workflow diagram for the gene expression biomarker study which involve using principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the number of features (principal components), thus re... by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Classification performance results using 5-fold cross-validation for the training datasets after applying the data imbalance tool, SMOTE and NQE for data embedding. The values without the ‘±’ signs represent the results for the ‘test’ set.

    Classification performance results using 5-fold cross-validation for the training datasets after applying the data imbalance tool, SMOTE and NQE for data embedding. The values with... by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Data embedding by using Neural Quantum Embedding (NQE).

    Data embedding by using Neural Quantum Embedding (NQE). by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC11.

    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC11. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 6 PCs case.

    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 6 PCs case. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 5 PCs case.

    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 5 PCs case. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 4 PCs case.

    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+NN and NQE+QNN in the 4 PCs case. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC10.

    The PCA plots of the data distribution (mRNA) projected onto two principal components selected from PC1 through PC10. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+SVC and NQE+QSVC in the 4 PCs case.

    The results of 10 performance metrics from the miRNA biomarker study (M0 vs M1), comparing NQE+SVC and NQE+QSVC in the 4 PCs case. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Classification performance results using 5-fold cross-validation for the training datasets after applying the data imbalance tool, SMOTE and NQE for data embedding. The values without the ‘±’ signs represent the results for the ‘test’ set.

    Classification performance results using 5-fold cross-validation for the training datasets after applying the data imbalance tool, SMOTE and NQE for data embedding. The values with... by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    The workflow of integrating NQE with QSVC and QNN classifiers.

    The workflow of integrating NQE with QSVC and QNN classifiers. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    The results of the 4 differentially expressed miRNAs obtained by analysing miRNAs expression profiles using the R ‘limma’ package.

    The results of the 4 differentially expressed miRNAs obtained by analysing miRNAs expression profiles using the R ‘limma’ package. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Training loss results plotted against the number of iterations.

    Training loss results plotted against the number of iterations. by Aninda Astuti (21736334)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: