A new fast filtering algorithm for a 3D point cloud based on RGB-D information by Chaochuan Jia (7256237)

“…Then, the optimal segmentation threshold of the V image that is calculated by using the Otsu algorithm is applied to segment the color mapping image into a binary image, which is used to extract the valid point cloud from the original point cloud with outliers. …”

One advantage of our algorithm is that it is not binary in nature. by Yong Kuk Kim (13955214)

Optimization of tracking parameters based on <i>P</i>_<i>swap</i>. by Benjamin Gallois (10131683)

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

“…<b>I)</b> Testing data consisting of 20% of the entire dataset. <b>J)</b> Optimization of hyperparameter tuning. <b>K)</b> Algorithm selection from all models. …”

Overview of the segmentation algorithm. by Michael C. Robitaille (11949174)

The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Symmetry test result. by Jiyong Moon (16819302)

Fig 2 - by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

An illustration and comparison of the fitness convergence curves for the Large-scale dataset (WaveformEW), medium-scale dataset (Zoo dataset), and Small-scale (Wine dataset) using... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

An illustration and comparison of the cost convergence curves for the Large-scale dataset (WaveformEW), medium-scale dataset (Zoo dataset), and Small-scale (Wine dataset) using 50... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some high-dimensional datasets usi... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some medium-sized dimensional data... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some small-sized dimensional datas... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

“…From this dataset we can compute the MI between each interaction and the outcome and <b>(D)</b> obtain a ranked list (<i>I</i>_<i>δ</i>) based on this metric. …”

Design and implementation of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) algorithm for predicting the severity of COVID-19. by Jiaqing Luo (10975030)

“…EVAL1: The correlation between input features <i>x</i>∈<i>X</i> and output features y∈<i>Y</i>, <i>R</i>[<i>x,y</i>] or <i>R</i>[<i>y,x</i>]; EVAL2: The correlation between input features <i>x</i>∈<i>X</i> and labeled features v∈<i>L</i>, <i>R</i>[<i>x,v</i>] or <i>R</i>[<i>v,x</i>]; Subset: The optimal input feature subset. (D). The MCDM algorithm-Stage 4. …”

Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans. by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

Identification and quantitation of clinically relevant microbes in patient samples: Comparison of three k-mer based classifiers for speed, accuracy, and sensitivity by George S. Watts (7962206)

Bayesian sequential design for sensitivity experiments with hybrid responses by Yuxia Liu (1779592)

“…To deal with the problem of complex computation involved in searching for optimal designs, fast algorithms are presented using two strategies to approximate the optimal criterion, denoted as SI-optimal design and Bayesian D-optimal design, respectively. …”

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”