Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

Binary contingency table. by Lu Xiao (314030)

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

Flow diagram of the proposed model. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Convergence curve of feature selection algorithms across 11 datasets with KNN classifier. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The accuracy score change matrix following model development. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Confusion matrix of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects: