Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Proposed Algorithm. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”

The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

Comparisons between ADAM and NADAM optimizers. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”

IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The accuracy score change matrix following model development. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of the proposed model. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects: