Showing 1 - 20 results of 24 for search '(( binary data code optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary 95 based optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    ROC curve for binary classification. by Nicodemus Songose Awarayi (18414494)

    Published 2024
    “…Specifically, an image enhancement algorithm based on histogram equalization and bilateral filtering techniques was deployed to reduce noise and enhance the quality of the images. …”
  7. 7

    Confusion matrix for binary classification. by Nicodemus Songose Awarayi (18414494)

    Published 2024
    “…Specifically, an image enhancement algorithm based on histogram equalization and bilateral filtering techniques was deployed to reduce noise and enhance the quality of the images. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment by Jianfang Cao (1881379)

    Published 2019
    “…<div><p>An image classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating is proposed to address the low classification accuracy of the current single-feature classification algorithms and simple multifeature fusion algorithms. …”
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Algoritmo de clasificación de expresiones de odio por tipos en español (Algorithm for classifying hate expressions by type in Spanish) by Daniel Pérez Palau (11097348)

    Published 2024
    “…</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>File Structure</b></p><p dir="ltr">The code generates and saves:</p><ul><li>Weights of the trained model (.h5)</li><li>Configured tokenizer</li><li>Training history in CSV</li><li>Requirements file</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>Important Notes</b></p><ul><li>The model excludes category 2 during training</li><li>Implements transfer learning from a pre-trained model for binary hate detection</li><li>Includes early stopping callbacks to prevent overfitting</li><li>Uses class weighting to handle category imbalances</li></ul><p dir="ltr">The process of creating this algorithm is explained in the technical report located at: Blanco-Valencia, X., De Gregorio-Vicente, O., Ruiz Iniesta, A., & Said-Hung, E. (2025). …”
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Testing results for classifying AD, MCI and NC. by Nicodemus Songose Awarayi (18414494)

    Published 2024
    “…Specifically, an image enhancement algorithm based on histogram equalization and bilateral filtering techniques was deployed to reduce noise and enhance the quality of the images. …”
  14. 14

    Summary of existing CNN models. by Nicodemus Songose Awarayi (18414494)

    Published 2024
    “…Specifically, an image enhancement algorithm based on histogram equalization and bilateral filtering techniques was deployed to reduce noise and enhance the quality of the images. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Supplementary file 1_Comparative evaluation of fast-learning classification algorithms for urban forest tree species identification using EO-1 hyperion hyperspectral imagery.docx by Veera Narayana Balabathina (22518524)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Methods<p>Thirteen supervised classification algorithms were comparatively evaluated, encompassing traditional spectral/statistical classifiers—Maximum Likelihood, Mahalanobis Distance, Minimum Distance, Parallelepiped, Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Spectral Information Divergence (SID), and Binary Encoding—and machine learning algorithms including Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  20. 20

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”