Search alternatives:
derived optimization » driven optimization (Expand Search), required optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
data derived » data driven (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
derived optimization » driven optimization (Expand Search), required optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
data derived » data driven (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
52
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
53
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60