Search alternatives:
feature optimization » resource optimization (Expand Search), feature elimination (Expand Search), structure optimization (Expand Search)
model optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), global optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
data feature » data figure (Expand Search), each feature (Expand Search), a feature (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
binary base » binary mask (Expand Search), ciliary base (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
base model » based model (Expand Search), based models (Expand Search), game model (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 227 for search '(( binary data feature optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary base model optimization algorithm ))*', query time: 0.48s Refine Results
  1. 1
    IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.

    IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.

    The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.

    IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms.

    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification.

    The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    <i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow.

    <i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

    Published 2023
    “…<b>(C)</b> The whole training data is then scanned, searching for these sequences and deriving a re-encoded dataset where interaction terms are binary features (i.e., 1 if sequence <i>i</i> is observed in <i>j</i>-th patient genotype, 0 otherwise). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    The result of the accuracy of tested algorithms.

    The result of the accuracy of tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2.

    Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Best fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Best fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Mean fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Mean fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Comparison between ILSTM and machine learning-based algorithms in binary classification.

    Comparison between ILSTM and machine learning-based algorithms in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Comparison between ILSTM and deep learning-based algorithms in binary classification.

    Comparison between ILSTM and deep learning-based algorithms in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: