Search alternatives:
feature optimization » resource optimization (Expand Search), feature elimination (Expand Search), structure optimization (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
data feature » data figure (Expand Search), each feature (Expand Search), a feature (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
binary mapk » binary mask (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
mapk design » task design (Expand Search), app design (Expand Search), tank designs (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 122 for search '(( binary data feature optimization algorithms ) OR ( binary mapk design optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms.

    F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms.

    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    The result of the accuracy of tested algorithms.

    The result of the accuracy of tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2.

    Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

    a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Best fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Best fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Mean fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Mean fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    The flowchart showing the optimization process of the hybrid methods using BEOSA as the base algorithm and SA and FFA as integrated algorithms.

    The flowchart showing the optimization process of the hybrid methods using BEOSA as the base algorithm and SA and FFA as integrated algorithms. by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Boxplots analysis of the tested algorithms using average error rate across 21 datasets.

    Boxplots analysis of the tested algorithms using average error rate across 21 datasets. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods.

    Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    S1 Dataset - Novel chaotic oppositional fruit fly optimization algorithm for feature selection applied on COVID 19 patients’ health prediction

    S1 Dataset - Novel chaotic oppositional fruit fly optimization algorithm for feature selection applied on COVID 19 patients’ health prediction by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    The result of the best fitness value, mean fitness value, standard deviation of fitness value and feature selection ratio of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

    The result of the best fitness value, mean fitness value, standard deviation of fitness value and feature selection ratio of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.

    IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    CEC 2019 benchmark characteristics.

    CEC 2019 benchmark characteristics. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: