The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

DE algorithm flow. by Ling Zhao (111365)

“…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”

Test results of different algorithms. by Ling Zhao (111365)

“…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”

Functional fitness test results of different algorithms. by Ling Zhao (111365)

Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Initial parameter settings for the optimization algorithms. by Doaa Sami Khafaga (21463870)

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

MSE for ILSTM algorithm in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

New building interior space layout model flow. by Ling Zhao (111365)

“…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”

Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

Bar chart comparing the average fitness values of various feature selection algorithms. by Doaa Sami Khafaga (21463870)

Box plots with swarm overlays for six feature selection algorithms, annotated with mean and standard deviation values. by Doaa Sami Khafaga (21463870)

Line plots showing performance trends for six evaluation metrics across CNN combined with different bio-inspired optimization algorithms. by Doaa Sami Khafaga (21463870)

IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”