S and V shaped transfer functions. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

Collaborative hunting behavior. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

Friedman average rank sum test results. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”

Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data by Fei Xue (24567)

“…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png by Minjin Guo (22751300)

“…CardioSpectra formulates athlete profiles as multivariate probabilistic entities across latent diagnostic states, using sparsity-aware inference to generate interpretable risk predictions while optimizing a sensitivity-specificity trade-off tailored to clinical priorities. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield... by Uttam Khatri (12689072)

“…Finally, we implemented and compared the different feature selection algorithms to integrate the structural features, brain networks, and voxel features to optimize the diagnostic identifications of AD using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. …”

Models and Dataset by M RN (9866504)

“…<p dir="ltr"><b>P3DE (Parameter-less Population Pyramid with Deep Ensemble):</b><br>P3DE is a hybrid feature selection framework that combines the Parameter-less Population Pyramid (P3) metaheuristic optimization algorithm with a deep ensemble of autoencoders. …”

Processed dataset to train and test the WGAN-GP_IMOA_DA_Ensemble model by Ramya Chinnasamy (21633527)

“…This framework integrates a novel biologically inspired optimization algorithm, the Indian Millipede Optimization Algorithm (IMOA), for effective feature selection. …”

Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat. by Enrico Bertozzi (22461709)

“…<p dir="ltr">Objective<br><br>To evaluate the predictive ability of the "habitat" variable, in isolation, to determine mushroom toxicity (edible or poisonous) using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification model, investigating whether this single feature is sufficient to build a robust and reliable classifier. …”

DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx by Massaine Bandeira e Sousa (7866242)

“…The accuracy of the optimal scenario for classifying samples with a cooking time of 30 minutes reached RCal2  = 0.86 and RVal2 = 0.84, with a Kappa value of 0.53. …”

Table_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx by Massaine Bandeira e Sousa (7866242)

“…The accuracy of the optimal scenario for classifying samples with a cooking time of 30 minutes reached RCal2  = 0.86 and RVal2 = 0.84, with a Kappa value of 0.53. …”

Supplementary Material 8 by Nishitha R Kumar (19750617)

“…</li><li><b>Adaboost: </b>A boosting algorithm that combines weak classifiers iteratively, refining predictions and improving the identification of antimicrobial resistance patterns.…”