Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Numerical example for determining the optimal number of clusters in Algorithm 2. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

Binary contingency table. by Lu Xiao (314030)

RMSE on the test data when fitting (logistic) quadratic models to binary data across increasing measurement error values . by Jakub Stoklosa (3315042)

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Homomorphic binary tree. by Jianhua He (341366)

Confusion matrix for a binary outcome (adapted from Fawcett [30]). by João Albuquerque (12936572)

Effects of Class Imbalance and Data Scarcity on the Performance of Binary Classification Machine Learning Models Developed Based on ToxCast/Tox21 Assay Data by Changhun Kim (682542)

“…In this study, the effects of CI and data scarcity (DS) on the performance of binary classification models were investigated using ToxCast bioassay data. …”

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

Convergence curve of feature selection algorithms across 11 datasets with KNN classifier. by Yi Wei Tye (22208735)

Python-Based Algorithm for Estimating NRTL Model Parameters with UNIFAC Model Simulation Results by Se-Hee Jo (20554623)

“…The percentage mean absolute residuals of the activity coefficients obtained using DEA, NMM, and the parameter estimation tool in Aspen Plus were in the ranges of 0.05–16.69, 0.05–16.69, and 0.09–326.77%, respectively. This in-house algorithm will be helpful for obtaining more accurate NRTL parameters in a timely manner and will facilitate the simulation of biochemical processes for process optimization, energy consumption estimation, and life cycle assessment.…”

Flow diagram of the proposed model. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects: