Showing 21 - 36 results of 36 for search '(( binary data robust classification algorithm ) OR ( binary data code optimization algorithm ))*', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 21

    Collaborative hunting behavior. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
  2. 22

    Friedman average rank sum test results. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

    Published 2025
    “…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
  3. 23

    Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data by Fei Xue (24567)

    Published 2021
    “…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”
  4. 24

    Related studies on IDS using deep learning. by Arshad Hashmi (13835488)

    Published 2024
    “…The model’s binary and multi-class classification accuracies on the UNSW-NB15 dataset are 99.56% and 99.45%, respectively. …”
  5. 25

    The architecture of the BI-LSTM model. by Arshad Hashmi (13835488)

    Published 2024
    “…The model’s binary and multi-class classification accuracies on the UNSW-NB15 dataset are 99.56% and 99.45%, respectively. …”
  6. 26

    Comparison of accuracy and DR on UNSW-NB15. by Arshad Hashmi (13835488)

    Published 2024
    “…The model’s binary and multi-class classification accuracies on the UNSW-NB15 dataset are 99.56% and 99.45%, respectively. …”
  7. 27

    Comparison of DR and FPR of UNSW-NB15. by Arshad Hashmi (13835488)

    Published 2024
    “…The model’s binary and multi-class classification accuracies on the UNSW-NB15 dataset are 99.56% and 99.45%, respectively. …”
  8. 28

    Table_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx by Massaine Bandeira e Sousa (7866242)

    Published 2024
    “…Two NIRs devices, the portable QualitySpec® Trek (QST) and the benchtop NIRFlex N-500 were used to collect spectral data. Classification of genotypes was carried out using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN) and partial least squares (PLS) models. …”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32

    Models and Dataset by M RN (9866504)

    Published 2025
    “…Its simplicity and lack of algorithm-specific parameters make it computationally efficient and easy to apply in high-dimensional problems such as gene selection for cancer classification.…”
  13. 33

    Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element by I-Lin Ho (13768960)

    Published 2022
    “…</p> <p>(4) export geometry/optics raw data and figures for binary DOE devices.</p> <p><br></p> <p>[Wolfram Mathematica code "square_triangle_DOE.nb"]:</p> <p>read the optimized binary DOE document (after Fortran & C++ code) to calculate its diffractive fields for comparison.…”
  14. 34

    Supplementary Material 8 by Nishitha R Kumar (19750617)

    Published 2025
    “…</li><li><b>Radial basis function kernel-support vector machine (RBF-SVM): </b>A more flexible version of SVM that uses a non-linear kernel to capture complex relationships in genomic data, improving classification accuracy.</li><li><b>Extra trees classifier: </b>This tree-based ensemble method enhances classification by randomly selecting features and thresholds, improving robustness in <i>E. coli</i> strain differentiation.…”
  15. 35

    iNCog-EEG (ideal vs. Noisy Cognitive EEG for Workload Assessment) Dataset by Fariya Bintay Shafi (21692408)

    Published 2025
    “…Inside each folder, four <b>.EDF</b> files represent the workload conditions:</p><pre><pre>subxx_nw.EDF → No Workload (resting state) <br>subxx_lw.EDF → Low Workload (easy multitasking) <br>subxx_mw.EDF → Moderate Workload (medium multitasking) <br>subxx_hw.EDF → High Workload (hard multitasking) <br></pre></pre><ul><li><b>Subjects 01–30:</b> Clean EEG recordings</li><li><b>Subjects 31–40:</b> Noisy EEG recordings with real-world artifacts</li></ul><p dir="ltr">This structure ensures straightforward differentiation between clean vs. noisy data and across workload levels.</p><h3>Applications</h3><p dir="ltr">This dataset can be applied to a wide range of research areas, including:</p><ul><li>EEG signal denoising and artifact rejection</li><li>Binary and hierarchical <b>cognitive workload classification</b></li><li>Development of <b>robust Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs)</b></li><li>Benchmarking algorithms under <b>ideal and noisy conditions</b></li><li>Multitasking and mental workload assessment in <b>real-world scenarios</b></li></ul><p dir="ltr">By combining controlled multitasking protocols with deliberately introduced environmental noise, <b>iNCog-EEG provides a comprehensive benchmark</b> for advancing EEG-based workload recognition systems in both clean and challenging conditions.…”
  16. 36

    Image_1_Validation of miRNA signatures for ovarian cancer earlier detection in the pre-diagnosis setting using machine learning approaches.pdf by Konrad Stawiski (4753380)

    Published 2024
    “…We employed the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to train a binary classification model using 70% of the available data, while the model was tested on the remaining 30% of the dataset.…”