Comparison between ILSTM and machine learning-based algorithms in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

Comparison between ILSTM and deep learning-based algorithms in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

“…<p><b>(A)</b> Input data is a list of genotype-level SNPs. <b>(B)</b> Focusing on the positive class only, the algorithm exploits FIM (<i>apriori</i> algorithm) to build a list of candidate interactions of any desired order, retaining those that have an empirical frequency above a given threshold <i>δ</i>. …”

MSE for ILSTM algorithm in binary classification. by Asmaa Ahmed Awad (16726315)

“…The ILSTM was then used to build an efficient intrusion detection system for binary and multi-class classification cases. The proposed algorithm has two phases: phase one involves training a conventional LSTM network to get initial weights, and phase two involves using the hybrid swarm algorithms, CBOA and PSO, to optimize the weights of LSTM to improve the accuracy. …”

Several loop patterns found in binary code. by Alba Pedro-Zapater (8600382)

Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans. by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The flowchart of the proposed algorithm. by Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh (18610943)

“…To overcome this limitation, recent advancements have introduced multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for ATS. This study proposes an enhancement to the performance of ATS through the utilization of an improved version of the Binary Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (BMOGWO), incorporating mutation. …”

The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The accuracy score change matrix following model development. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of the proposed model. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The most effective active substances for subfertility treatment. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Confusion matrix of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of the conversion of drugs into active substances. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Calibration curve of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects: