Search alternatives:
group classification » risk classification (Expand Search), improve classification (Expand Search), perform classification (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
binary each » binary health (Expand Search)
group classification » risk classification (Expand Search), improve classification (Expand Search), perform classification (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
binary each » binary health (Expand Search)
-
1
For each classification algorithm, the classification accuracies for binary subject groups NC versus EMCI, NC versus LEMC, EMCI versus LEMC, EMCI versus AD, LMCI versus AD, AD versus NC.
Published 2022“…<p>For each classification algorithm, the classification accuracies for binary subject groups NC versus EMCI, NC versus LEMC, EMCI versus LEMC, EMCI versus AD, LMCI versus AD, AD versus NC.…”
-
2
The maximum accuracy (lowest error rate) with the least number of ANOVA-ranked genes achieved by different feature filtering methods and classification algorithms refined by SIRRFE under various classification tasks, including: the multiclass classification for distinguishing each individual PAH patient group (Control <i>vs</i>....
Published 2019“…<p>The maximum accuracy (lowest error rate) with the least number of ANOVA-ranked genes achieved by different feature filtering methods and classification algorithms refined by SIRRFE under various classification tasks, including: the multiclass classification for distinguishing each individual PAH patient group (Control <i>vs</i>. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Partial dependence plots (A – G) and the resulting clustered feature importance (H) for each feature and trained model.
Published 2025“…In H), we hierarchically clustered (Euclidean distance with average linking) the feature importance resulting from the normalized variance in the partial dependence plots for each trained model. Tree-based algorithms (i.e., Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and RUSBoost) are grouped together indicating similar underlying mechanisms for the classification. …”
-
7
Receiver operating curves for NLP classification.
Published 2020“…These curves represent different combinations of text featurization (BOW, tf-idf, GloVe) and binary classification algorithms (Logistic Regression, k-NN, CART, OCT, OCT-H, RF, RNN). …”
-
8
Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf
Published 2020“…In this way, for each binary problem, the CSP algorithm produces features to determine if the specific body part is engaged in the task or not. …”
-
9
-
10
Participants’ demographic characteristics.
Published 2024“…We used confounder-controlled rs-FNC and applied machine learning algorithms (including support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor) and deep learning models (i.e., fully-connected neural networks) to classify subjects in binary and three-class categories according to their diagnosis labels (e.g., AD, SZ, and CN). …”
-
11
Imaging parameters.
Published 2024“…We used confounder-controlled rs-FNC and applied machine learning algorithms (including support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor) and deep learning models (i.e., fully-connected neural networks) to classify subjects in binary and three-class categories according to their diagnosis labels (e.g., AD, SZ, and CN). …”
-
12
Supplementary Material for: Detecting atrial fibrillation by artificial intelligence enabled neuroimaging examination.
Published 2025“…We hypothesise that machine learning algorithm increases the accurate classification of MRIs of stroke patients into those due to AF vs large artery atherosclerosis. …”
-
13
PathOlOgics_RBCs Python Scripts.zip
Published 2023“…</p><p dir="ltr">In terms of classification, a second algorithm was developed and employed to preliminary sort or group the individual cells (after excluding the overlapping cells manually) into different categories using five geometric measurements applied to the extracted contour from each binary image mask (see PathOlOgics_script_2; preliminary shape measurements). …”
-
14
DataSheet1_Comparison of Descriptor- and Fingerprint Sets in Machine Learning Models for ADME-Tox Targets.docx
Published 2022“…The literature-based, medium-sized binary classification datasets (all above 1,000 molecules) were used for the model building by two common algorithms, XGBoost and the RPropMLP neural network. …”
-
15
Image1_Comparison of Descriptor- and Fingerprint Sets in Machine Learning Models for ADME-Tox Targets.TIF
Published 2022“…The literature-based, medium-sized binary classification datasets (all above 1,000 molecules) were used for the model building by two common algorithms, XGBoost and the RPropMLP neural network. …”
-
16
DataSheet_2_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.pdf
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
17
DataSheet_1_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.xlsx
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
18
Accessibility of translation initiation sites is the strongest predictor of heterologous protein expression in <i>E. coli</i>.
Published 2021“…This partition function approach can be customised and executed using the algorithm implemented in RNAplfold. B: mRNA features ranked by Gini importance for random forest classification of the expression outcomes of the PSI:Biology targets (N = 8,780 and 2,650, ‘success’ and ‘failure’ groups, respectively). …”
-
19
Demonstration data on the set up of consumer wearable device for exposure and health monitoring in population studies
Published 2022“…The Variables included in the first three excel tabs were the following: Participant ID (Unique serial number for patient participating in the study), % Time Before (Percentage of time with data before protocol implementation), % Time After (Percentage of time with data after protocol implementation), Timestamp (Date and time of event occurrence), Indoor/Outdoor (Categorical- Classification of GPS signals to Indoor and Outdoor and null(missing value) based on distance from participant home), Filling algorithm (Imputation algorithm), SSID (Wireless network name connected to the smartwatch), Wi-Fi Signal Strength (Connection strength via Wi-Fi between smartwatch and home’s wireless network. (0 maximum strength), IMEI (International mobile equipment identity. …”
-
20
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
Published 2021“…We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”