Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
yet optimization » art optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary first » bars first (Expand Search), binary pairs (Expand Search)
first design » test design (Expand Search), post design (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
based yet » based cft (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
yet optimization » art optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary first » bars first (Expand Search), binary pairs (Expand Search)
first design » test design (Expand Search), post design (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
based yet » based cft (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Datasets and their properties.
Published 2023“…The binary Ebola optimization search algorithm (BEOSA) is applied for the level-1 mutation, while the simulated annealing (SA) and firefly (FFA) algorithms are investigated for the level-2 optimizer. …”
-
5
Parameter settings.
Published 2023“…The binary Ebola optimization search algorithm (BEOSA) is applied for the level-1 mutation, while the simulated annealing (SA) and firefly (FFA) algorithms are investigated for the level-2 optimizer. …”
-
6
Parameter settings of the comparison algorithms.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
7
-
8
<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow.
Published 2023“…From this dataset we can compute the MI between each interaction and the outcome and <b>(D)</b> obtain a ranked list (<i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>) based on this metric. <b>(E)</b> Starting from the interaction at the top of <i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>, <i>hi</i>PRS constructs <i>I</i><sub><i>K</i></sub>, selecting <i>K</i> (where <i>K</i> is user-specified) terms through the greedy optimization of the ratio between MI (<i>relevance</i>) and a suitable measure of similarity for interactions (<i>redundancy)</i> (cf. …”
-
9
SHAP bar plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
10
Sample screening flowchart.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
11
Descriptive statistics for variables.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
12
SHAP summary plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
13
ROC curves for the test set of four models.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
14
Display of the web prediction interface.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
15
-
16
Comparison in terms of the sensitivity.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
17
Parameter sensitivity of BIMGO.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
18
Details of the medical datasets.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
19
The flowchart of IMGO.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”
-
20
Comparison in terms of the selected features.
Published 2024“…In this paper, we present an improved mountain gazelle optimizer (IMGO) based on the newly proposed mountain gazelle optimizer (MGO) and design a binary version of IMGO (BIMGO) to solve the feature selection problem for medical data. …”