Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
art optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), after optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary plot » binary plddt (Expand Search), binary depot (Expand Search)
plot based » plant based (Expand Search)
image art » image a (Expand Search), age art (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
art optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), after optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary plot » binary plddt (Expand Search), binary depot (Expand Search)
plot based » plant based (Expand Search)
image art » image a (Expand Search), age art (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm
Published 2025“…In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates </p><p dir="ltr">Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image classification and a binary Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) </p><p dir="ltr">algorithm for feature selection. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Data_Sheet_1_Pneumonia detection by binary classification: classical, quantum, and hybrid approaches for support vector machine (SVM).pdf
Published 2024“…A support vector machine (SVM) is attractive because binary classification can be represented as an optimization problem, in particular as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, which, in turn, maps naturally to an Ising model, thereby making annealing—classical, quantum, and hybrid—an attractive approach to explore. …”
-
11
-
12
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. Finally, the plot of location feature distance illustrates that CBFD exhibits minimal distance compared to DITF and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). …”
-
13
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. Finally, the plot of location feature distance illustrates that CBFD exhibits minimal distance compared to DITF and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). …”
-
14
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. Finally, the plot of location feature distance illustrates that CBFD exhibits minimal distance compared to DITF and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). …”
-
15
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. Finally, the plot of location feature distance illustrates that CBFD exhibits minimal distance compared to DITF and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). …”
-
16
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. Finally, the plot of location feature distance illustrates that CBFD exhibits minimal distance compared to DITF and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). …”
-
17
DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
Published 2024“…Fifteen roots from five plants per plot, featuring diameters ranging from 4 to 7 cm, were randomly chosen for cooking analysis and spectral data collection. …”
-
18
Table_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
Published 2024“…Fifteen roots from five plants per plot, featuring diameters ranging from 4 to 7 cm, were randomly chosen for cooking analysis and spectral data collection. …”
-
19
Flow diagram of the automatic animal detection and background reconstruction.
Published 2020“…(E) The threshold value is calculated based on the histogram: it is the mean of the image subtracted by 4 (optimal value defined by trial and error). …”