Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
image bayesian » disease bayesian (Expand Search)
binary space » banach space (Expand Search)
space based » surface based (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
image bayesian » disease bayesian (Expand Search)
binary space » banach space (Expand Search)
space based » surface based (Expand Search)
-
21
Backtracking strategy diagram.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
22
Comparison of differences in literature methods.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
23
Schematic of iteration process of IDE-IIGA.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
24
Schematic diagram of IGA chromosome coding.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40