Search alternatives:
convex optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search)
guided optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search)
convex optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search)
guided optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search)
-
1
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
2
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
3
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
4
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
5
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
6
PathOlOgics_RBCs Python Scripts.zip
Published 2023“…</p><p dir="ltr">In terms of classification, a second algorithm was developed and employed to preliminary sort or group the individual cells (after excluding the overlapping cells manually) into different categories using five geometric measurements applied to the extracted contour from each binary image mask (see PathOlOgics_script_2; preliminary shape measurements). …”