Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
data global » daily global (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
data global » daily global (Expand Search)
-
21
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
22
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
27
DataSheet_1_Raman Spectroscopic Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae From Other Streptococci Using Laboratory Strains and Clinical Isolates.pdf
Published 2022“…Improvement of the classification rate is expected with optimized model parameters and algorithms as well as with a larger spectral data base for training.…”
-
28
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
29
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
30
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
31
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
32
Generalized Tensor Decomposition With Features on Multiple Modes
Published 2021“…Our proposal handles a broad range of data types, including continuous, count, and binary observations. …”
-
33
Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element
Published 2022“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”
-
34
Solubility Prediction of Different Forms of Pharmaceuticals in Single and Mixed Solvents Using Symmetric Electrolyte Nonrandom Two-Liquid Segment Activity Coefficient Model
Published 2019“…The methodology incorporates key features of the symmetric eNRTL-SAC model structure to reduce the number of parameters and uses a hybrid of global search algorithms for parameter estimation. …”
-
35
-
36
Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf
Published 2020“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”
-
37
GSE96058 information.
Published 2024“…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
-
38
The performance of classifiers.
Published 2024“…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
-
39