Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
path optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
data path » data data (Expand Search), data part (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
path optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
data path » data data (Expand Search), data part (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
A* Path-Finding Algorithm to Determine Cell Connections
Published 2025“…Pixel paths were classified using a z-score brightness threshold of 1.21, optimized for noise reduction and accuracy. …”
-
3
-
4
PathOlOgics_RBCs Python Scripts.zip
Published 2023“…</p><p dir="ltr">In terms of classification, a second algorithm was developed and employed to preliminary sort or group the individual cells (after excluding the overlapping cells manually) into different categories using five geometric measurements applied to the extracted contour from each binary image mask (see PathOlOgics_script_2; preliminary shape measurements). …”
-
5
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
6
-
7
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
8
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
9
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
10
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
11
Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element
Published 2022“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”
-
12
Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf
Published 2020“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”
-
13
Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides
Published 2024“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”
-
14
Data_Sheet_1_Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield...
Published 2022“…Finally, we implemented and compared the different feature selection algorithms to integrate the structural features, brain networks, and voxel features to optimize the diagnostic identifications of AD using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. …”