Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
points optimization » joint optimization (Expand Search), process optimization (Expand Search), potency optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
points optimization » joint optimization (Expand Search), process optimization (Expand Search), potency optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary data » primary data (Expand Search), dietary data (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides
Published 2024“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”
-
6
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
15
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
16
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20