Search alternatives:
process optimization » model optimization (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
edge process » due process (Expand Search), edge processing (Expand Search), peace process (Expand Search)
process optimization » model optimization (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
edge process » due process (Expand Search), edge processing (Expand Search), peace process (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Comparisons of computation rate performance for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
Comparison of total time consumed for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
The evolution of the Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) time fraction β over simulation frames.
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
-
13
CDF of task latency, approximated as the inverse of the achieved computation rate.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
17
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
18
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
19
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
20
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”