Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
guided optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
guided optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
3
IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
4
IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
5
Pseudo Code of RBMO.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
6
P-value on CEC-2017(Dim = 30).
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
7
Memory storage behavior.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
8
Elite search behavior.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
9
Description of the datasets.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
10
S and V shaped transfer functions.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
11
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
12
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
13
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
14
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
15
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
16
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
17
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
18
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
19
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
20
Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element
Published 2022“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”