Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
task optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
less based » lens based (Expand Search), lemos based (Expand Search), degs based (Expand Search)
based task » based case (Expand Search), based test (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
task optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
image design » images designed (Expand Search), simple design (Expand Search), space design (Expand Search)
less based » lens based (Expand Search), lemos based (Expand Search), degs based (Expand Search)
based task » based case (Expand Search), based test (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Demonstration of algorithm convergence.
Published 2025“…To maintain dynamic market equilibrium, we develop two types of pricing algorithms, one based on stepped price adjustments for selected sellers, and another based on smoothed adjustments for all sellers. …”
-
6
Tasks with varying sizes.
Published 2024“…This results in the successful execution of most of the tasks within their deadline. In addition, <i>EOTE</i> − <i>FSC</i> modifies the task sequencing with a deadline algorithm for the fog node to optimally execute the offloaded tasks in such a way that most of the high-priority tasks are entertained. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Assigning different sizes of task.
Published 2024“…This results in the successful execution of most of the tasks within their deadline. In addition, <i>EOTE</i> − <i>FSC</i> modifies the task sequencing with a deadline algorithm for the fog node to optimally execute the offloaded tasks in such a way that most of the high-priority tasks are entertained. …”
-
11
Standard deviation for a varying number of tasks.
Published 2024“…This results in the successful execution of most of the tasks within their deadline. In addition, <i>EOTE</i> − <i>FSC</i> modifies the task sequencing with a deadline algorithm for the fog node to optimally execute the offloaded tasks in such a way that most of the high-priority tasks are entertained. …”
-
12
An overview of PHyPO.
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
13
S8 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
14
S6 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
15
S5 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
16
S17 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
17
S11 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
18
S10 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
19
S4 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”
-
20
S2 Data -
Published 2024“…The results of the proposed algorithm show a significant improvement over benchmark techniques along with achieving an accuracy of 96.1% for the optimal partitioning model and 94.3% for the optimal offloading model, with both the results being achieved in significantly less or equal time as compared to the benchmark techniques.…”