Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm by Hussein Ali Bardan (21976208)

“…This strategy </p><p dir="ltr">not only improves detection efficiency and accuracy but also supports early diagnosis and treatment planning, </p><p dir="ltr">leading to better patient outcomes. By leveraging the binary GWO algorithm to optimize the feature selection </p><p dir="ltr">process and CNNs for image classification, the proposed approach reduces computational costs while increasing </p><p dir="ltr">classification accuracy. …”

The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

Feature selection convergence time comparison of various binary metaheuristic algorithms. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

The flowchart showing the optimization process of the hybrid methods using BEOSA as the base algorithm and SA and FFA as integrated algorithms. by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

Subjects:

Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment by Jianfang Cao (1881379)

“…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …”

The result of the accuracy of tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Experimental observation of gastruloids and shape quantification using LOCO-EFA. by Martijn A. de Jong (17896732)

Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Best fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Mean fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Optimizing Kernel Transformations to Handle Binary Class Imbalanced Dataset Classification by Vaibhavi Patel (19843282)

a) Accuracy and b) selected feature size of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Boxplots analysis of the tested algorithms using average error rate across 21 datasets. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

Subjects:

Schematic of iteration process of IDE-IIGA. by Ling Zhao (111365)

An optimization process of the proposed hybrid BEOSA (HBEOSA) combining both SA and FFA methods into BEOSA. by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

Subjects:

Feature selection process. by Balraj Preet Kaur (20370832)

Histograms of various water quality parameters, including pH, Hardness, Solids, Chloramines, Sulfate, Organic Carbon, Trihalomethanes, Turbidity, and a binary portability check. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

Proposed Algorithm. by Hend Bayoumi (22693738)

Subjects: