The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

S1 Data - by Haoqiang Liu (193675)

Pseudo Code of RBMO. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Binary leaf image rotated anti-clock wise from the origin degree to 40^<i>o</i>, 80^<i>o</i>, 120^<i>o</i>, and 160^<i>o</i> from left to ri... by Ali Ahmed (2567584)

The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

Microsoft excel file containing exhaustive list of Abbreviated-Injury Scale codes used to generate binary variables encoding the presence or absence of injury to various body regio... by Michael D. Cobler-Lichter (22492930)

Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm by Hussein Ali Bardan (21976208)

“…In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates </p><p dir="ltr">Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image classification and a binary Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) </p><p dir="ltr">algorithm for feature selection. …”

Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment by Jianfang Cao (1881379)

“…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …”

Generalized Tensor Decomposition With Features on Multiple Modes by Jiaxin Hu (1327875)

“…An efficient alternating optimization algorithm with provable spectral initialization is further developed. …”

Fig 3 - by Ali Ahmed (2567584)

Experimental observation of gastruloids and shape quantification using LOCO-EFA. by Martijn A. de Jong (17896732)

Table_1_An efficient decision support system for leukemia identification utilizing nature-inspired deep feature optimization.pdf by Muhammad Awais (263096)

“…To optimize feature selection, a customized binary Grey Wolf Algorithm is utilized, achieving an impressive 80% reduction in feature size while preserving key discriminative information. …”

Surround Suppression mechanism. by Elnaz Nemati (21402730)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Segmentation, trace denoising and spike extraction framework. by Changjia Cai (10647521)

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

“…<b>Fii)</b> Texture information using local binary patterns. <b>Fiii)</b> Additional texture information using Haralick texture features. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”