Showing 121 - 140 results of 226 for search '(( binary image features optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary base based optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 121

    Identification and quantitation of clinically relevant microbes in patient samples: Comparison of three k-mer based classifiers for speed, accuracy, and sensitivity by George S. Watts (7962206)

    Published 2019
    “…We tested the accuracy, sensitivity, and resource requirements of three top metagenomic taxonomic classifiers that use fast k-mer based algorithms: Centrifuge, CLARK, and KrakenUniq. …”
  2. 122
  3. 123

    Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  4. 124
  5. 125

    Plan frame of the house. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  6. 126

    Ablation test results. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  7. 127

    Hyperparameter selection test. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  8. 128

    Multiple index test results of different methods. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  9. 129

    Backtracking strategy diagram. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  10. 130

    Comparison of differences in literature methods. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  11. 131

    New building interior space layout model flow. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  12. 132

    Schematic of iteration process of IDE-IIGA. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  13. 133

    Schematic diagram of IGA chromosome coding. by Ling Zhao (111365)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>To solve the problems of insufficient global optimization ability and easy loss of population diversity in building interior layout design, this study proposes a novel layout optimization model integrating interactive genetic algorithm and improved differential evolutionary algorithm to improve the global optimization ability and maintain population diversity in building layout design. …”
  14. 134

    <i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

    Published 2023
    “…From this dataset we can compute the MI between each interaction and the outcome and <b>(D)</b> obtain a ranked list (<i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>) based on this metric. <b>(E)</b> Starting from the interaction at the top of <i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>, <i>hi</i>PRS constructs <i>I</i><sub><i>K</i></sub>, selecting <i>K</i> (where <i>K</i> is user-specified) terms through the greedy optimization of the ratio between MI (<i>relevance</i>) and a suitable measure of similarity for interactions (<i>redundancy)</i> (cf. …”
  15. 135

    Data_Sheet_1_A real-time driver fatigue identification method based on GA-GRNN.ZIP by Xiaoyuan Wang (492534)

    Published 2022
    “…In this paper, a non-invasive and low-cost method of fatigue driving state identification based on genetic algorithm optimization of generalized regression neural network model is proposed. …”
  16. 136

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  17. 137

    Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  18. 138

    Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
  19. 139
  20. 140