A* Path-Finding Algorithm to Determine Cell Connections by Max Weng (22327159)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">Astrocytes were dissociated from E18 mouse cortical tissue, and image data were processed using a Cellpose 2.0 model to mask nuclei. …”

The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

Dataset 2: Zip file containing the Tables of the presented method and results by Suchismita Behera (22027316)

Image2_Bipartite graph search optimization for type II diabetes mellitus Jamu formulation using branch and bound algorithm.JPEG by Wisnu Ananta Kusuma (9276182)

Image1_Bipartite graph search optimization for type II diabetes mellitus Jamu formulation using branch and bound algorithm.JPEG by Wisnu Ananta Kusuma (9276182)

Image4_Bipartite graph search optimization for type II diabetes mellitus Jamu formulation using branch and bound algorithm.jpg by Wisnu Ananta Kusuma (9276182)

Image5_Bipartite graph search optimization for type II diabetes mellitus Jamu formulation using branch and bound algorithm.jpg by Wisnu Ananta Kusuma (9276182)

Image3_Bipartite graph search optimization for type II diabetes mellitus Jamu formulation using branch and bound algorithm.JPEG by Wisnu Ananta Kusuma (9276182)

Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Data_Sheet_1_Pneumonia detection by binary classification: classical, quantum, and hybrid approaches for support vector machine (SVM).pdf by Sai Sakunthala Guddanti (17739363)

“…A support vector machine (SVM) is attractive because binary classification can be represented as an optimization problem, in particular as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, which, in turn, maps naturally to an Ising model, thereby making annealing—classical, quantum, and hybrid—an attractive approach to explore. …”

Schematic representation of semi-automated algorithm for organoids analyzing. by Anna Demchenko (18449439)

Flowchart of software workflow. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

tUbenet Foundation Model Weights by Natalie Holroyd (7099391)

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Image2_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF by Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Experimental observation of gastruloids and shape quantification using LOCO-EFA. by Martijn A. de Jong (17896732)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Presentation_1_Modified GAN Augmentation Algorithms for the MRI-Classification of Myocardial Scar Tissue in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.PPTX by Umesh C. Sharma (10785063)

“…Currently, there are no optimized deep-learning algorithms for the automated classification of scarred vs. normal myocardium. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”