S1 Data - by Haoqiang Liu (193675)

The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Pseudo Code of RBMO. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Overview of the segmentation algorithm. by Michael C. Robitaille (11949174)

Microsoft excel file containing exhaustive list of Abbreviated-Injury Scale codes used to generate binary variables encoding the presence or absence of injury to various body regio... by Michael D. Cobler-Lichter (22492930)

Surround Suppression mechanism. by Elnaz Nemati (21402730)

A new fast filtering algorithm for a 3D point cloud based on RGB-D information by Chaochuan Jia (7256237)

“…Then, the optimal segmentation threshold of the V image that is calculated by using the Otsu algorithm is applied to segment the color mapping image into a binary image, which is used to extract the valid point cloud from the original point cloud with outliers. …”

Symmetry test result. by Jiyong Moon (16819302)

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

Algoritmo de clasificación de expresiones de odio por tipos en español (Algorithm for classifying hate expressions by type in Spanish) by Daniel Pérez Palau (11097348)

“…</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>File Structure</b></p><p dir="ltr">The code generates and saves:</p><ul><li>Weights of the trained model (.h5)</li><li>Configured tokenizer</li><li>Training history in CSV</li><li>Requirements file</li></ul><p dir="ltr"><b>Important Notes</b></p><ul><li>The model excludes category 2 during training</li><li>Implements transfer learning from a pre-trained model for binary hate detection</li><li>Includes early stopping callbacks to prevent overfitting</li><li>Uses class weighting to handle category imbalances</li></ul><p dir="ltr">The process of creating this algorithm is explained in the technical report located at: Blanco-Valencia, X., De Gregorio-Vicente, O., Ruiz Iniesta, A., & Said-Hung, E. (2025). …”

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

tUbenet Foundation Model Weights by Natalie Holroyd (7099391)

Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png by Minjin Guo (22751300)

Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element by I-Lin Ho (13768960)

“…</p> <p>(4) export geometry/optics raw data and figures for binary DOE devices.</p> <p><br></p> <p>[Wolfram Mathematica code "square_triangle_DOE.nb"]:</p> <p>read the optimized binary DOE document (after Fortran & C++ code) to calculate its diffractive fields for comparison.…”