A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some high-dimensional datasets usi... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some medium-sized dimensional data... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

A radar plot illustrating the comparison of the classification accuracy, cost values, and fitness values for the hybrids of BEOSA when applied to some small-sized dimensional datas... by Olaide N. Oyelade (14047002)

Overview of the segmentation algorithm. by Michael C. Robitaille (11949174)

Reproducing kernel-based semiparametric functional smoothed score estimation with binary responses by Meichen Liu (8168148)

Data_Sheet_1_A Global Optimizer for Nanoclusters.PDF by Maya Khatun (7437011)

“…This method is implemented in PyAR (https://github.com/anooplab/pyar) program. The global optimization in PyAR involves two parts, generation of several trial geometries and gradient-based local optimization of the trial geometries. …”

A new fast filtering algorithm for a 3D point cloud based on RGB-D information by Chaochuan Jia (7256237)

“…Then, the optimal segmentation threshold of the V image that is calculated by using the Otsu algorithm is applied to segment the color mapping image into a binary image, which is used to extract the valid point cloud from the original point cloud with outliers. …”

Symmetry test result. by Jiyong Moon (16819302)

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

UK Biobank data wrangling statistics and results. by Simeone Marino (81051)

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png by Minjin Guo (22751300)

Seed mix selection model by Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar (10923639)

“…On some extensions to GA package: hybrid optimization, parallelization and islands evolution. …”