Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

tUbenet Foundation Model Weights by Natalie Holroyd (7099391)

Flowchart of software workflow. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment by Jianfang Cao (1881379)

“…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …”

Experimental observation of gastruloids and shape quantification using LOCO-EFA. by Martijn A. de Jong (17896732)

Fig 3 - by Ali Ahmed (2567584)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Workflow of the flow cytometry experiment and the software-based analysis. by Verena Fischer (3857632)

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR. by Linus Woitke (22783534)

“…The image is then cleaned in c) using morphological filtering with an <i>opening</i> operation to remove small-scale noise. …”

Image1_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF by Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Image3_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF by Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Image2_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF by Sizhuo Yu (11429743)

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

DataSheet1_A tumor-associated endothelial signature score model in immunotherapy and prognosis across pan-cancers.PDF by Shuzhao Chen (9649139)

DataSheet3_A tumor-associated endothelial signature score model in immunotherapy and prognosis across pan-cancers.PDF by Shuzhao Chen (9649139)

DataSheet2_A tumor-associated endothelial signature score model in immunotherapy and prognosis across pan-cancers.PDF by Shuzhao Chen (9649139)

Table_1_Serum Levels of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Predict Tumor Response and Outcome to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.docx by Sven H. Loosen (5866946)

“…This finding was confirmed by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis including several clinicopathological parameters. …”