Search alternatives:
scale optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search)
cell optimization » field optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search)
library based » laboratory based (Expand Search)
scale optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search)
cell optimization » field optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search)
library based » laboratory based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Optimal 8-mer and 9-mer SARS-CoV-2 epitope identification.
Published 2020“…As controls for strong Kb and Db binders respectively, Ova peptide and ZIKV E294 were input into the same algorithm. Optimal peptide epitopes are highlighted based on functional T cell data in combination with RMA-S stabilization assay data.…”
-
6
Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment
Published 2019“…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …”
-
7
Cheminformatics-Guided Cell-Free Exploration of Peptide Natural Products
Published 2024“…To assess the peptide NP space that is directly accessible to current cell-free technologies, we developed a peptide parsing algorithm that breaks down peptide NPs into building blocks based on ribosomal translation logic. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
11
-
12
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
13
-
14
Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR.
Published 2025“…The image is then cleaned in c) using morphological filtering with an <i>opening</i> operation to remove small-scale noise. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
19
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
20
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”