بدائل البحث:
weight optimization » design optimization (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
robust optimization » process optimization (توسيع البحث), robust estimation (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
image weight » tag weight (توسيع البحث), more weight (توسيع البحث)
scale robust » enable robust (توسيع البحث)
weight optimization » design optimization (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
robust optimization » process optimization (توسيع البحث), robust estimation (توسيع البحث), joint optimization (توسيع البحث)
image weight » tag weight (توسيع البحث), more weight (توسيع البحث)
scale robust » enable robust (توسيع البحث)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Improved support vector machine classification algorithm based on adaptive feature weight updating in the Hadoop cluster environment
منشور في 2019"…The MapReduce parallel programming model on the Hadoop platform is used to perform an adaptive fusion of hue, local binary pattern (LBP) and scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features extracted from images to derive optimal combinations of weights. …"
-
5
-
6
Image processing workflow.
منشور في 2020"…<p>Raw fluorescent microscope images (a) were processed with a binary segmentation algorithm, and clusters of bacterial cells were manually annotated. …"
-
7
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
منشور في 2021"…A total of 4,198 radiomics features were extracted from the pre-biopsy multi-parametric MRI (including dynamic contrast-enhancement T1-weighted images, fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of each patient. …"
-
8
Sample image for illustration.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
9
Comparison analysis of computation time.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
10
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
11
Precision recall curve.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
12
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
منشور في 2024"…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …"
-
13
Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat.
منشور في 2025"…Both the SVM model with a linear kernel and the one with an RBF kernel achieved identical results. Optimization with GridSearchCV corroborated this stagnation, identifying a simple linear model (C=0.05, gamma='scale') as the optimal configuration, indicating that the additional complexity of nonlinear kernels did not confer predictive gains. …"