Search alternatives:
compared optimization » competing optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search), convex optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
5 compared » _ compared (Expand Search)
library 5 » library _ (Expand Search), library a (Expand Search), library i (Expand Search)
compared optimization » competing optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search), convex optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
5 compared » _ compared (Expand Search)
library 5 » library _ (Expand Search), library a (Expand Search), library i (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm
Published 2025“…In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates </p><p dir="ltr">Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image classification and a binary Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) </p><p dir="ltr">algorithm for feature selection. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Binary contingency table.
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”
-
16
Structure of skip-gram model [37].
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”
-
17
CBOW and skip-gram models [36].
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”
-
18
Tourist attraction classification data set.
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”
-
19
Customized dictionary.
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”
-
20
Tourist attraction description text data.
Published 2024“…Acc, marco-F1, and mirco-F1 values are respectively 2.29%, 5.55%, and 2.90% higher. Moreover, the algorithm can identify rare categories in the imbalanced dataset and exhibit better stability across datasets of different sizes. …”