Search alternatives:
complex optimization » convex optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), codon optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
library layer » library based (Expand Search)
complex optimization » convex optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), codon optimization (Expand Search)
wolf optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), swarm optimization (Expand Search), _ optimization (Expand Search)
library layer » library based (Expand Search)
-
1
Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Deep Learning Methods and Binary GWO Algorithm
Published 2025“…In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates </p><p dir="ltr">Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image classification and a binary Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) </p><p dir="ltr">algorithm for feature selection. …”
-
2
-
3
Table_1_An efficient decision support system for leukemia identification utilizing nature-inspired deep feature optimization.pdf
Published 2024“…To optimize feature selection, a customized binary Grey Wolf Algorithm is utilized, achieving an impressive 80% reduction in feature size while preserving key discriminative information. …”
-
4
An Ecological Benchmark of Photo Editing Software: A Comparative Analysis of Local vs. Cloud Workflows
Published 2025“…Experimental Methodology Framework Local Processing Pipeline Architecture Data Flow: Storage I/O → Memory Buffer → CPU/GPU Processing → Cache Coherency → Storage I/O ├── Input Vector: mmap() system call for zero-copy file access ├── Processing Engine: OpenMP parallelization with NUMA-aware thread affinity ├── Memory Management: Custom allocator with hugepage backing └── Output Vector: Direct I/O bypassing kernel page cache Cloud Processing Pipeline Architecture Data Flow: Local Storage → Network Stack → TLS Tunnel → CDN Edge → Origin Server → Processing Grid → Response Pipeline ├── Upload Phase: TCP window scaling with congestion control algorithms ├── Network Layer: Application-layer protocol with adaptive bitrate streaming ├── Server-side Processing: Containerized microservices on Kubernetes orchestration ├── Load Balancing: Consistent hashing with geographic affinity routing └── Download Phase: HTTP/2 multiplexing with server push optimization Dataset Schema and Semantic Structure Primary Data Vectors Field Data Type Semantic Meaning Measurement Unit test_type Categorical Processing paradigm identifier {local_processing, cloud_processing} photo_count Integer Cardinality of input asset vector Count avg_file_size_mb Float64 Mean per-asset storage footprint Mebibytes (2^20 bytes) total_volume_gb Float64 Aggregate data corpus size Gigabytes (10^9 bytes) processing_time_sec Integer Wall-clock execution duration Seconds (SI base unit) cpu_usage_watts Float64 Thermal design power consumption Watts (Joules/second) ram_usage_mb Integer Peak resident set size Mebibytes network_upload_mb Float64 Egress bandwidth utilization Mebibytes energy_consumption_kwh Float64 Cumulative energy expenditure Kilowatt-hours co2_equivalent_g Float64 Carbon footprint estimation Grams CO₂e test_date ISO8601 Temporal execution marker RFC 3339 format hardware_config String Node topology identifier Alphanumeric encoding Statistical Distribution Characteristics The dataset exhibits non-parametric distribution patterns with significant heteroscedasticity across computational load vectors. …”