Search alternatives:
designed optimization » design optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search)
path optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
images designed » scales designed (Expand Search)
binary images » binary image (Expand Search)
class path » class data (Expand Search)
designed optimization » design optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search)
path optimization » swarm optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
images designed » scales designed (Expand Search)
binary images » binary image (Expand Search)
class path » class data (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
3
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
4
DataSheet1_Quantum-inspired optimization for wavelength assignment.PDF
Published 2023“…Playing a central role in modern telecommunications, this problem belongs to NP-complete class for a general case so that obtaining optimal solutions for industry-relevant cases is exponentially hard. …”
-
5
PathOlOgics_RBCs Python Scripts.zip
Published 2023“…</p><p dir="ltr">In terms of classification, a second algorithm was developed and employed to preliminary sort or group the individual cells (after excluding the overlapping cells manually) into different categories using five geometric measurements applied to the extracted contour from each binary image mask (see PathOlOgics_script_2; preliminary shape measurements). …”
-
6
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
7
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
8
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
9
Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element
Published 2022“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”
-
10
Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides
Published 2024“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”
-
11
Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf
Published 2020“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”