Search alternatives:
selection algorithm » detection algorithm (Expand Search), detection algorithms (Expand Search)
dose optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
sample selection » sample collection (Expand Search)
binary wave » binary image (Expand Search)
binary map » binary mask (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
map sample » a sample (Expand Search), tag sample (Expand Search), small sample (Expand Search)
wave dose » same dose (Expand Search)
selection algorithm » detection algorithm (Expand Search), detection algorithms (Expand Search)
dose optimization » based optimization (Expand Search), model optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
sample selection » sample collection (Expand Search)
binary wave » binary image (Expand Search)
binary map » binary mask (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
map sample » a sample (Expand Search), tag sample (Expand Search), small sample (Expand Search)
wave dose » same dose (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Supplementary file 1_Comparative evaluation of fast-learning classification algorithms for urban forest tree species identification using EO-1 hyperion hyperspectral imagery.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>Thirteen supervised classification algorithms were comparatively evaluated, encompassing traditional spectral/statistical classifiers—Maximum Likelihood, Mahalanobis Distance, Minimum Distance, Parallelepiped, Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Spectral Information Divergence (SID), and Binary Encoding—and machine learning algorithms including Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). …”
-
7
DataSheet_2_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.pdf
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
8
DataSheet_1_MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.xlsx
Published 2021“…The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.</p>Results<p>Models for discriminating between Warthin’s and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin’s tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. …”
-
9
Gene Scores - Adjusted - Regular
Published 2022“…<div>Gene scores for selected combinations of phenotypes and</div><div>SNV-to-gene mappings as calculated using genuine summary </div><div>statistics with MAGMA's (v1.08) SNP-Wise Mean algorithm, after adjustment for residual effects of known confounders.…”
-
10
Gene Scores - Unadjusted - Regular
Published 2022“…<div>Gene scores for selected combinations of phenotypes and</div><div>SNV-to-gene mappings as calculated using genuine summary </div><div>statistics with MAGMA's (v1.08) SNP-Wise Mean algorithm. …”
-
11
Raw LC-MS/MS and RNA-Seq Mitochondria data
Published 2025“…The target for average reads per sample was approximately 25 million. The QC pipeline included: 1) quality check of the raw sequencing data using FastQC (v 0.11.9) and MultiQC (v 1.9); 2) mapping the sequencing reads to the human genome (build 102) using HISAT2 (v 2.2.1), followed by SAMtools (v 1.12) to convert BAM (Binary Alignment Map) into SAM (Sequence Alignment Map) files; 3) assembly of RNA-seq reads into transcripts using StringTie (v 2.1.4); and 4) calculation of expression levels from read counts, producing a gene count matrix. …”