Search alternatives:
driven optimization » design optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
binary remains » bird remains (Expand Search)
remains robust » remain robust (Expand Search)
binary mapk » binary mask (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
driven optimization » design optimization (Expand Search), guided optimization (Expand Search), dose optimization (Expand Search)
robust optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), robust estimation (Expand Search), joint optimization (Expand Search)
binary remains » bird remains (Expand Search)
remains robust » remain robust (Expand Search)
binary mapk » binary mask (Expand Search), binary image (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
4
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
5
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
6
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
7
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”
-
8
DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
Published 2024“…Despite the increased complexity associated with binary classification, it remained more efficient, offering higher classification accuracy for samples and facilitating the selection of the most relevant time or variables, such as cooking time ≤ 30 minutes. …”
-
9
Table_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
Published 2024“…Despite the increased complexity associated with binary classification, it remained more efficient, offering higher classification accuracy for samples and facilitating the selection of the most relevant time or variables, such as cooking time ≤ 30 minutes. …”