30-Meter Resolution Dataset of Abandoned and Reclaimed Croplands in Inner Mongolia, China (2000-2022) by Deji Wuyun (18440981)

Image3_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.jpeg by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Image4_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.jpeg by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Image1_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.jpeg by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Table1_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.docx by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Image2_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.jpeg by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Image5_DFUCare: deep learning platform for diabetic foot ulcer detection, analysis, and monitoring.jpeg by Varun Sendilraj (19732510)

“…</p>Results<p>DFUCare achieved an F1-score of 0.80 and a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.861 for wound localization. For infection classification, we obtained a binary accuracy of 79.76%, while ischemic classification reached 94.81% on the validation set. …”

Supplementary Material 8 by Nishitha R Kumar (19750617)

“…</li><li><b>XGboost: </b>An optimized gradient boosting algorithm that efficiently handles large genomic datasets, commonly used for high-accuracy predictions in <i>E. coli</i> classification.…”

Seed mix selection model by Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar (10923639)

“…GA: A Package for Genetic Algorithms in R. <em>Journal of Statistical Software</em>, <em>53</em>, 1-37. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v53/i04</p> <p>Scrucca, L. (2017). …”

Flow diagram of the automatic animal detection and background reconstruction. by David Tadres (9120564)

“…(E) The threshold value is calculated based on the histogram: it is the mean of the image subtracted by 4 (optimal value defined by trial and error). …”

Machine Learning-Ready Dataset for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Soham Savarkar (21811825)

“…</p><p dir="ltr">These biological metrics were used to define a binary toxicity label: entries were classified as toxic (1) or non-toxic (0) based on thresholds from standardized guidelines (e.g., ISO 10993-5:2009) and literature consensus. …”