Showing 1 - 9 results of 9 for search '(( binary marker base optimization algorithm ) OR ( binary ms based optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
  4. 4

    Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
  5. 5

    Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
  6. 6

    Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
  7. 7

    Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

    Published 2024
    “…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
  8. 8

    Data_Sheet_1_Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Analysis Using Resting-State Functional MRI Functional Brain Network With Multi-Measures Features and Hippocampal Subfield... by Uttam Khatri (12689072)

    Published 2022
    “…Finally, we implemented and compared the different feature selection algorithms to integrate the structural features, brain networks, and voxel features to optimize the diagnostic identifications of AD using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. …”
  9. 9

    Machine Learning-Ready Dataset for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Soham Savarkar (21811825)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p dir="ltr">These biological metrics were used to define a binary toxicity label: entries were classified as toxic (1) or non-toxic (0) based on thresholds from standardized guidelines (e.g., ISO 10993-5:2009) and literature consensus. …”