Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
2_an optimization » _ optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), ai optimization (Expand Search)
mask based » task based (Expand Search), tasks based (Expand Search), risk based (Expand Search)
image 2_an » image 2_a (Expand Search), image 2_case (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
2_an optimization » _ optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), ai optimization (Expand Search)
mask based » task based (Expand Search), tasks based (Expand Search), risk based (Expand Search)
image 2_an » image 2_a (Expand Search), image 2_case (Expand Search)
-
1
A* Path-Finding Algorithm to Determine Cell Connections
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr">Astrocytes were dissociated from E18 mouse cortical tissue, and image data were processed using a Cellpose 2.0 model to mask nuclei. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Data_Sheet_1_Pneumonia detection by binary classification: classical, quantum, and hybrid approaches for support vector machine (SVM).pdf
Published 2024“…A support vector machine (SVM) is attractive because binary classification can be represented as an optimization problem, in particular as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, which, in turn, maps naturally to an Ising model, thereby making annealing—classical, quantum, and hybrid—an attractive approach to explore. …”
-
11
-
12
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
13
-
14
Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model.
Published 2024“…<b>I)</b> Testing data consisting of 20% of the entire dataset. <b>J)</b> Optimization of hyperparameter tuning. <b>K)</b> Algorithm selection from all models. …”
-
15
-
16
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
17
Presentation_1_Modified GAN Augmentation Algorithms for the MRI-Classification of Myocardial Scar Tissue in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.PPTX
Published 2021“…Currently, there are no optimized deep-learning algorithms for the automated classification of scarred vs. normal myocardium. …”
-
18
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
19
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
20
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”