Search alternatives:
complex optimization » convex optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
based complex » layer complex (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search)
binary mask » binary image (Expand Search)
complex optimization » convex optimization (Expand Search), whale optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
based complex » layer complex (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search)
binary mask » binary image (Expand Search)
-
21
Related Work Summary.
Published 2025“…EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”
-
22
Simulation parameters.
Published 2025“…EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”
-
23
Training losses for N = 10.
Published 2025“…EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”
-
24
Normalized computation rate for N = 10.
Published 2025“…EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”
-
25
Summary of Notations Used in this paper.
Published 2025“…EHRL integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to dynamically optimize binary offloading decisions, which in turn obviates the requirement for manually labeled training data and thus avoids the need for solving complex optimization problems repeatedly. …”
-
26
Triplet Matching for Estimating Causal Effects With Three Treatment Arms: A Comparative Study of Mortality by Trauma Center Level
Published 2021“…Few studies, however, have used matching designs with more than two groups, due to the complexity of matching algorithms. We fill the gap by developing an iterative matching algorithm for the three-group setting. …”
-
27
Pseudo Code of RBMO.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
28
P-value on CEC-2017(Dim = 30).
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
29
Memory storage behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
30
Elite search behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
31
Description of the datasets.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
32
S and V shaped transfer functions.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
33
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
34
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
35
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
36
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
37
Predictive Analysis of Mushroom Toxicity Based Exclusively on Their Natural Habitat.
Published 2025“…Both the SVM model with a linear kernel and the one with an RBF kernel achieved identical results. Optimization with GridSearchCV corroborated this stagnation, identifying a simple linear model (C=0.05, gamma='scale') as the optimal configuration, indicating that the additional complexity of nonlinear kernels did not confer predictive gains. …”
-
38
Bayesian sequential design for sensitivity experiments with hybrid responses
Published 2023“…To deal with the problem of complex computation involved in searching for optimal designs, fast algorithms are presented using two strategies to approximate the optimal criterion, denoted as SI-optimal design and Bayesian D-optimal design, respectively. …”
-
39
Supplementary Material 8
Published 2025“…</li><li><b>XGboost: </b>An optimized gradient boosting algorithm that efficiently handles large genomic datasets, commonly used for high-accuracy predictions in <i>E. coli</i> classification.…”
-
40
DataSheet_1_Near infrared spectroscopy for cooking time classification of cassava genotypes.docx
Published 2024“…Despite the increased complexity associated with binary classification, it remained more efficient, offering higher classification accuracy for samples and facilitating the selection of the most relevant time or variables, such as cooking time ≤ 30 minutes. …”