Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
more design » core design (Expand Search), pre design (Expand Search), home design (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
more design » core design (Expand Search), pre design (Expand Search), home design (Expand Search)
-
21
Pseudo Code of RBMO.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
22
P-value on CEC-2017(Dim = 30).
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
23
Memory storage behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
24
Elite search behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
25
Description of the datasets.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
26
S and V shaped transfer functions.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
27
S- and V-Type transfer function diagrams.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
28
Collaborative hunting behavior.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
29
Friedman average rank sum test results.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
30
IRBMO vs. variant comparison adaptation data.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. …”
-
31
-
32
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
33
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
34
Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data
Published 2021“…Specifically, the proposed method obtains the optimal DTR via integrating estimations of decision rules at multiple stages into a single multicategory classification algorithm without imposing additional constraints, which is also more computationally efficient and robust. …”
-
35
Steps in the extraction of 14 coordinates from the CT slices for the curved MPR.
Published 2025“…Protruding paths are then eliminated using graph-based optimization algorithms, as demonstrated in f). …”
-
36
DataSheet_1_Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.docx
Published 2021“…We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). …”
-
37
Presentation_1_Modified GAN Augmentation Algorithms for the MRI-Classification of Myocardial Scar Tissue in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.PPTX
Published 2021“…Currently, there are no optimized deep-learning algorithms for the automated classification of scarred vs. normal myocardium. …”
-
38
Table_1_An efficient decision support system for leukemia identification utilizing nature-inspired deep feature optimization.pdf
Published 2024“…To optimize feature selection, a customized binary Grey Wolf Algorithm is utilized, achieving an impressive 80% reduction in feature size while preserving key discriminative information. …”
-
39
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
40
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”